19 January 2012

My Canadian Open Government Consultation Submission


Some of the questions posed in the Canadian Open Government Consultation Submission required written responses.  Here are my responses:

question 1: "What could be done to make it easier for you to find and use government data provided online?"
To make data easy to find I would like to see all of the available data along with descriptive text, preferably one dataset per page, published on government web sites that can be indexed by Google.

To make the data easy to use, I would like to see the data published in open non-proprietary formats. The data should be addressable by URL, without any requirement to sign in or identify or be required to click on anything extra in order to download the data as these sorts of mechanisms are obstacles to performing repetitive automated tasks.

The data should be either released as public domain, or if that's not possible then it should be licensed under a legal framework that conforms with the open data definition posted on opendefinition.org. The Open Data Usability Index (ODUI) document at OpenDataBC also provides helpful information about how to make data more usable. http://www.opendatabc.ca/odui.html

question 3: "How would you use or manipulate this data?"
I would use the data to create analysis and visualizations that would help Canadians better understand their country. I would create value added applications that would help people to create businesses and jobs using open data. I would also try to help people use the data, by providing online tutorials and holding events that would encourage people to get involved. I would like to help create the incentives for citizens of Canada get more engaged and participate more with their governments (local, provincial, federal).

question 4: "What could be done to make it easier for you to find government information online?"
Government information should be made available to search engines like Google by providing topic specific pages, in text that search engines can understand so that people can use the tools they are used to to get information. There is no need to create an elaborate portal and specialized search engine for this sort of effort, at least in the foreseeable future.

Specifically about Open Information, again, it should all be either released to the public domain or if that's not possible licensed using a license that conforms to opendefinition.org. It should not be given a different license than open data if you want people to be able to use it.

question 7: "Do you have suggestions on how the Government of Canada could improve how it consults with Canadians?"
I don't have a lot of ideas here other than make use of the available social media tools such as Twitter and Google+ to reach out to Canadians. I don't always agree with Tony Clement, but I do like the way he engages citizens. I would like to see more MPs do the same. Also, adopt social media guidelines like the Province of BC has, which fosters trust with its employees and allows them to engage directly with citizens.


question 8: "Are there approaches used by other governments that you believe the Government of Canada could/should model?"
As far as open data goes, the legal framework is a big deal and why I keep advising governments to work hard to get this part of open data right. Follow the example of the US or Australia or New Zealand or Surrey or Langley or Township of Langley or Winnipeg Transit.

In Australia agencies are supposed to go through a process in order to keep data closed. (There is currently no binding law to enforce this but the intent is there). This would be relatively easy to put in place in many jurisdictions as data is already routinely assessed for privacy concerns and treated accordingly. Determining if it should be closed would be just another check box, and since the vast majority of public data should eventually be open data, it makes sense to identify and document the much smaller set of data destined to be closed.

I think there is an unintended side effect of the way open data is being rolled out in some jurisdictions. Public data that was once generally considered usable ( financials, stats, directories, registries, codes, inspection data, schedules ) are now considered not usable because they don't have explicit permissions associated with them. When they do get an official license applied to them, their new explicit "open" status can be significantly more restrictive than the implicit understanding prior to the movement.

Also, governments often set up a new agency that identifies data citizens can use and place it in a catalogue, and anything that's not in the catalogue then has a mysterious cloud over it by contrast, even if it was formerly considered public. Depending on how fast this new group can get through the relevant data to catalogue it, citizens could feel they have significantly less data than they had before the official process.

Everything already on the internet should just be open licensed.

question 9: "Are there any other comments or suggestions you would like to make pertaining to the Government of Canada's Open Government initiative?"
Thank you for taking the time and putting effort in to address this opportunity and to consult with citizens. I think we, as a country, have a lot to offer the world in terms of leadership in this space.

No comments: